The director of Gladiator II says the experience taught him to “never trust what people write about you.”
Most people frame awards or diplomas, but director Ridley Scott has a 42-year-old review framed in his office—a review he says “destroyed” him.
While talking to Entertainment Weekly about his new movie Gladiator II, Scott brought up the framed review while discussing the huge expectations for the sequel to the 2000 hit Gladiator, which won Best Picture.
Pauline Kael had a lot of harsh opinions about the 1982 sci-fi movie Blade Runner. While she admired its unique style, she criticized it for lacking emotional depth. In her review, she wrote,
See More: Ridley Scott Says He’s Trying To “Embrace” A.I., Despite, You Know, Blade Runner
Scott’s choice to frame the review and stop reading others has worked out for him. Over time, Blade Runner became one of his most respected films, and he’s been nominated for four Academy Awards since then. This experience taught him to trust himself.
Scott doesn’t want people to think his experience lets him do whatever he wants with his movies.
Ridley Scott’s mindset has helped him and led to an impressive variety of movies. While many of his films are big hits, he’s also shown great skill in making different kinds of movies. From Alien and its prequels to Blade Runner, The Martian, Gladiator, and now Gladiator II, his work has shaped science fiction and historical movies in big ways. Scott focuses on stories he truly believes in, and that’s what makes his movies so impactful.
Source: EW